It looks like the dark evil forces of right wing anti science denial have infiltrated the lair of...Gavin Schmidt? https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2015/2015_Marvel_ma03110j.pdf …
-
-
A 10-20 year hiatus wont show up on the Hockeystick, or and paleo proxy.
As Marcott said in his paper. his data does catch resolution less than 300 years, and only 50% at 1000 years. Thus, any warming like current, would be invisible. -
When two different resolutions are used, you should use lowest common resolution. If 1000 year mode is used, Marcott's graph is not so scary.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CsK7Sq-UsAEOhkq.jpg … - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
First, show the hockey stick curve on the hiatus.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The graphed hockeystick algorithm - could only show hockeysticks regardless of input. White noise -> hockeystick. So it did what climate 'scientists' wanted - unlike real world observations which have not. This is why climate 'scientists' prefer models to observations
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given that THE Hockey Stick graphs were published in 1998/99, anyone would be hard pressed to show the 1998 to 2015 hiatus on THE Hockey Stick graphs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I paraphrase... "No true scientist would merge instrumental temperature data on the same graph as proxy temperature data." Who said that? (Or a reasonable proximity of that?)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.