Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Atomsk's Sanakan‏ @AtomsksSanakan 4 Jan 2019
      Replying to @GregoryMakles @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays

      Atomsk's Sanakan Retweeted Atomsk's Sanakan

      Re: "Hammering the same question" Well, you denialists tend to dishonestly evade questions, so it's not surprising you get hammered on them. Let me know when you finally develop an honest interest in evidence.https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1081447627974234112 …

      Atomsk's Sanakan added,

      Atomsk's Sanakan @AtomsksSanakan
      Replying to @GregoryMakles @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays
      Re: "Homogenization methods don't reproduce data hidden from them" And you're making stuff up again, as expected. You Heller followers really have no honest interest in evidence. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/qj.2297 …
      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    2. Gregory Makles‏ @GregoryMakles 5 Jan 2019
      Replying to @AtomsksSanakan @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays

      I answered the question. You OTOH never adressed my question about what was the relevance of your question to the issue. That's the state of the debate, whether you like it or understand it. I am happy to let the crowd evaluate who makes the more sense here.

      3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Atomsk's Sanakan‏ @AtomsksSanakan 5 Jan 2019
      Replying to @GregoryMakles @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays

      Re: "You OTOH never adressed my question about what was the relevance of your question to the issue." Nope. I addressed it multiple times. Your response was just to make up nonsense with no evidence, as usual

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    4. Gregory Makles‏ @GregoryMakles 5 Jan 2019
      Replying to @AtomsksSanakan @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays

      Gregory Makles Retweeted Atomsk's Sanakan

      I bet you 50$ you can't post a twitt of you in that conversation that explain why your questions here:https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1081279028076654593 …

      Gregory Makles added,

      Atomsk's Sanakan @AtomsksSanakan
      Replying to @GregoryMakles @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays
      Re: "I completely" Are homogenization methods (including infilling) validated? Are homogenization methods (including infilling) validated by their ability to reproduce data that's hidden from them? Are temperature changes correlated across long distances?
      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Atomsk's Sanakan‏ @AtomsksSanakan 5 Jan 2019
      Replying to @GregoryMakles @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays

      Re: "I bet you 50$" And your silly dishonesty continues, as usual for Heller's followers. Hence your evasions of the questions, and lying even after being cited evidence rebutting your lies. https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1081753791677034496 …pic.twitter.com/fBj39NIkbn

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. Gregory Makles‏ @GregoryMakles 5 Jan 2019
      Replying to @AtomsksSanakan @JSegor @ScottAdamsSays

      You not willing to bet on your honesty is noted. Whatever you says matter less than your actions, hence it's now established you don't really believe you answered my question on relevance and have been repeatedly lying about it.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Gregory Makles‏ @GregoryMakles 5 Jan 2019
      Replying to @GregoryMakles @AtomsksSanakan and

      You're now muted, of course.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. AltUSARC‏ @AltUS_ARC 5 Jan 2019
      Replying to @GregoryMakles @AtomsksSanakan and

      You’re so full of shit. Homogenization reduces warming. And Tony Heller mutes those who show how he cherry picks. https://tamino.wordpress.com/2018/08/08/usa-temperature-can-i-sucker-you/ …pic.twitter.com/cio5pHLYTy

      2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
    9. Gregory Makles‏ @GregoryMakles 6 Jan 2019
      Replying to @AltUS_ARC @AtomsksSanakan and

      Your attempt at moving the goal post is noted. Nonetheless the present thread was « does homogenization creates new data ».

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 6 Jan 2019
      Replying to @GregoryMakles @AltUS_ARC and

      I think Nick Stokes, Zeke Hausfather, Tamino and Dana Nuccitelli are more persuasive & have more credibility than Tony Heller if you read their criticism thoroughly. I wouldn't stake my reputation on Heller, but others can if they want: fool's errandhttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/jun/25/global-warming-zombies-devour-telegraph-fox-news-brains …

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 6 Jan 2019
      Replying to @JSegor @GregoryMakles and

      Looks like they misrepresented the argument before criticizing it. The strong parts of Heller's argument (if true) are that the measuring devices that were NOT adjusted show no warming, and that all adjustments were in same direction.

      6:35 AM - 6 Jan 2019
      • 2 Likes
      • B. Machiavelli ex-Inside Trader
      7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        1. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 6 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GregoryMakles and

          Scott, the new insight I got out of the Nuccitelli article is that Heller is focussing on a very small part of the warming data: atmospheric warming over just the US. That is only "2% of 2%" of global warming or 0.04%. Read carefully again (I will too): https://skepticalscience.com/how-data-adjustments-affect-temp-records.html …

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 6 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GregoryMakles and

          "Over the full record, adjustments actually decrease the warming". I think they are talking ocean data here. "Warming of the atmosphere only accounts for about 2% of the Earth's surface". You need the full record (oceans and atmosphere) to show what is really going on.pic.twitter.com/yMFpwh0Cn6

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 6 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GregoryMakles and

          That is why I am concentrating on what's going on in the oceans (coral reefs, effects on hurricanes, etc.) as the most significant indicator of the warming trend up in the last 50 years or so.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 6 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GregoryMakles and

          "While much has been made about adjustments to individual land stations that increase warming, these are often extreme cases cherry-picked to make a point. When adjustments to all stations are considered, just as many reduce warming as increase warming."pic.twitter.com/3y9iylDxmF

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 6 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GregoryMakles and

          "The large pre-1940 bucket adjustments greatly reduce the long-term warming in the record, resulting in 36% less warming since 1880 than in the raw temperature data. In recent years, adjustments to ocean temperatures slightly increase the rate of warming by around 4%."

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Jeff Segor‏ @JSegor 6 Jan 2019
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GregoryMakles and

          Summary: 1) adjustments earlier in time were necessary, and recently not significantly different from raw 2) adjustments go in both directions accounting both land and sea and the entire globe. If I am not mistaken.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 6 Jan 2019
          Replying to @JSegor @GregoryMakles and

          If adjustments go both ways, that would seem to debunk the Heller narrative. How can a citizen tell which one is true? We have confident claims from capable people that are opposites.

          10 replies 1 retweet 1 like
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info