Re: "Hammering the same question" Well, you denialists tend to dishonestly evade questions, so it's not surprising you get hammered on them. Let me know when you finally develop an honest interest in evidence.https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1081447627974234112 …
-
-
Scott, the new insight I got out of the Nuccitelli article is that Heller is focussing on a very small part of the warming data: atmospheric warming over just the US. That is only "2% of 2%" of global warming or 0.04%. Read carefully again (I will too): https://skepticalscience.com/how-data-adjustments-affect-temp-records.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Over the full record, adjustments actually decrease the warming". I think they are talking ocean data here. "Warming of the atmosphere only accounts for about 2% of the Earth's surface". You need the full record (oceans and atmosphere) to show what is really going on.pic.twitter.com/yMFpwh0Cn6
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is why I am concentrating on what's going on in the oceans (coral reefs, effects on hurricanes, etc.) as the most significant indicator of the warming trend up in the last 50 years or so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"While much has been made about adjustments to individual land stations that increase warming, these are often extreme cases cherry-picked to make a point. When adjustments to all stations are considered, just as many reduce warming as increase warming."pic.twitter.com/3y9iylDxmF
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The large pre-1940 bucket adjustments greatly reduce the long-term warming in the record, resulting in 36% less warming since 1880 than in the raw temperature data. In recent years, adjustments to ocean temperatures slightly increase the rate of warming by around 4%."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Summary: 1) adjustments earlier in time were necessary, and recently not significantly different from raw 2) adjustments go in both directions accounting both land and sea and the entire globe. If I am not mistaken.
-
If adjustments go both ways, that would seem to debunk the Heller narrative. How can a citizen tell which one is true? We have confident claims from capable people that are opposites.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.