So then what are those 500 articles doing if not disproving a negative? I’m still waiting on this relatively simple challenge.
-
-
You didn't know this? This is like the Mesopotamia of my own personal "denial". They airbrushed the medieval warming period (warmer than now) and little ice age (colder than now) from the readings to create the elegant and then SUDDENLY ALARMING hockey stick graph.
-
The combination of
@MichaelMann's fraudulent graph with the massive and massively spiked East Anglia fraud sealed the deal for me. Mann et al are liars. They're actually WORSE than this guy below. He actually believed his climate schtick.pic.twitter.com/L8QG21cXAM
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Show me a NASA source that says we are in a pause.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Shattered in what way? I have only seen competing data based on satellite measurements and those have been explained away by scientists. Not credible compared to the alternative measures.
- Show replies
-
-
-
The tree ring measurements used by Mann et al to create the hockey stick graph are not wrong in and of themselves. The way they were used as proxies for temperature was wrong. The original papers claimed they were proxies for precipitation. The way they were compiled was wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Climate change is Mann-made
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hi Scott - there's a reason Michael Mann fought so hard to not make his data publicly available. This is a very good intro http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2008/8/11/caspar-and-the-jesus-paper.html … by
@aDissentient -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.