#ClimateChange Challenge: Review both sides of the argument (2 links each) and tell me which side of the climate debate is more PERSUASIVE.
NASA: https://go.nasa.gov/2la2ISR
Tony Heller: https://bit.ly/2LFpcct
Bloomberg: https://bloom.bg/2hxsT7D
Forbes:https://bit.ly/2LFhajR
-
-
What about the Maunder and Spörer minimums tied to their respective little Ice Ages? Are those considered correlation only?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So if I can up the CO2 concentration in my roof space to 600 ppm then I'll never need winter heating in my house?
-
I suspect there are more pathways for heat to exit your house than radiating through your roof.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If you mean variations in total solar output, yes. Output varies very little, with little change in insolation.
BUT....
Solar output in UV varies up to 25%. UV affects some parts of the atmosphere more than others. Ozone and the stratosphere strongly affected. -
Solar magnetic activity may affect cloud formation. Lower sunspot activity may increase cloud cover, which would lower temps, and vice versa. Only a about a 2% change in cloud cover would account for all observed warming. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
50 years ago mainstream science did not even consider CO2 (despite its rise) as a factor in the future of the climate. Their understanding now is still very limited. The fact is it is all hypothesis with no proof.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Astrophysicist Valentina Zharkova is not mainstream? Total solar irradience is a straw man. Have these "mainstream scientists" addressed cosmic ray fluctuation?
-
That’s a good point. There are several factors in solar activity. As solar surface activity decreases, cosmic rays increase. Data shows that the rotation of the earth speeds during these very quiet solar cycles, affecting tectonic/volcanic activity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Scott, your credibility as an arbiter in this debate died right there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
