My interpretation of this article: Scientists have no reliable temperature data history and thus there is no way to know whether or not the planet is warming. Am I wrong?https://twitter.com/JSegor/status/1080471267982008321 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
I may have to use Gavin Schmidt's response: "It's complicated". Here is a fact-check article explaining this a bit better than my original post. My understanding is that homogenization is to REMOVE BIAS, not bias it to fit warming theory.https://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/ …
7 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor
I wouldn't trust primo facie on this, but I wouldn't trust word salad either. I think a much better way is to say "look, you see there's a trigger and a raise, so if it's true it has to show somehow in the few unadjusted dataset we have relevant to the claim.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Now Tony Heller created a tool just to do that check but I'd need someone to check his code first. That's here (he also has a Mac version). https://realclimatescience.com/unhiding-the-decline-for-windows/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I toyed a bit with it in the meantime and it's pretty consistent whith what he's posting all the time - didn't look like heavy cherry picking to me. So we can assert his app doesn't tamper with evidence that's an important progress. Maybe you can ask your audience?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @JSegor
Not sure how to ask the question right. Can you give me a retweetable version with the link?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JSegor
Call for help - Tony Heller makes some striking claims that need to be verified. He made the tool he uses to produce his graph available so if you can check whether the code does what it aims to do or not it will answer a key question. https://realclimatescience.com/2018/12/settledscienceinnewmexico/ …
15 replies 9 retweets 48 likes -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @ScottAdamsSays
Here is another critique of Steven Goddard/Tony Heller methodology regarding the 'march of the thermometers'. Nick Stokes is analyzing here with input from Zeke Hausfather. Enjoy: https://moyhu.blogspot.com/2014/05/ushcn-adjustments-averages-anomalies.html …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Lacks persuasive juice.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @GregoryMakles
Engineers are the least persuasive people on earth. But they make near perfect landings on Mars (NASA). Persuasion is nice, but outcomes are what counts in the end.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.