-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s melted and it’s refrozen . . . Throughout millennia . . . This will never change unless the Earth happens to blow up
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not melting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Northwest passage, anyone?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like the reality where industry, humanitarian development and technology isn't impeded!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The "not melting" fraction has been more convincing for years now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not melting like they claim..CUI BONO?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m not persuaded by either one. Climate change is real, but I doubt it’s caused by humans, which is the main argument.
-
The main argument is that it's catastrophic. Using logic and statics, there's no reason to conclude that it will unless you buy into the naturalistic fallacy. It could just as well be a net benefit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
