My interpretation of this article: Scientists have no reliable temperature data history and thus there is no way to know whether or not the planet is warming. Am I wrong?https://twitter.com/JSegor/status/1080471267982008321 …
-
-
“All”? The odds are zero.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Touché. They claim many adjustments are in the other direction (actually showing cooling). I wouldn't know until I downloaded the data, their algorithms and did the analysis myself with help from a statistician. For now, I am trusting them.
-
From one of your link the explanation is mainly that the change from one tool of measurement to the other created a constant bias that then happened more and more as switch were being made over years (interestingly many scientist foresaw the discontinuity issue).
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Obama said the climate change debate is "settled". He is wrong and not a scientist. Science is never "settled", it keeps improving. Many things like the effect of climate change on hurricanes is still in its infancy right now. Other things are more apparent.
End of conversation
-
-
-
We only notice the adjustments highlighted by the sceptics.
-
Is it possible to do the same regression and extrapolation based on only the numbers that don't need adjustment? Or are there not enough of those?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
One of the major adjustments -equivalent in magnitude to GW itself - is due to change of thermometers from LiG(liquid in glass) systems to electronic MMTS systems. This paper compared the two over 8 years, & clearly found such adjustments aren't reliable https://climate.rutgers.edu/stateclim_v1/robinson_pubs/non_refereed/Croft_and_Robinson_1993.pdf …pic.twitter.com/TzsRiBWuWt
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.