#ClimateChange Challenge: Review both sides of the argument (2 links each) and tell me which side of the climate debate is more PERSUASIVE.
NASA: https://go.nasa.gov/2la2ISR
Tony Heller: https://bit.ly/2LFpcct
Bloomberg: https://bloom.bg/2hxsT7D
Forbes:https://bit.ly/2LFhajR
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
It's an idiotic argument written by someone who never learned basic physics. If you dig tens of billions of tons of carbon out of the Earth and put it into the atmosphere, it will accumulate and increase absorption of infrared radiation, thus warming the oceans and atmosphere
13 replies 13 retweets 57 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @iatetweet
But only to a point Scott. The absorption spectrum of CO2 (its ability to trap heat) is nearly saturated at about 200 ppm. It is the latent heat of water that drives temperature increase.pic.twitter.com/b9cgici6Yw
3 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @bfolson18 @iatetweet
Not a valid point unless it also explains the rapid recent rate of warming. Did we get more water from someplace?
6 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @iatetweet
A couple of strong El Niño’s explain the recent rise. If you factor out cooling from Pinatubo eruption and the El Niño’s of 1998 and 2016 there is very little tropospheric warming over the last 20 years.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bfolson18 @iatetweet
Not a credible view. NASA has examined those effects and they don't match the warming pattern. The people claiming otherwise are "guy on Internet with sketchy chart."
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @iatetweet
Lindzen and Choi are climate scientists. Work published in 2009. Isn’t the whole point of your challenge that “NASA” as an organization is not to be taken at face value?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bfolson18 @iatetweet
Some things are easy to check. NASA would know if other forces mapped to the heat trend more closely than CO2.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @iatetweet
Well yeah certain scientists within NASA believe it is the strongest correlation. But you know that’s not the case throughout history. My contention is that there isn’t a recent rapid rise.pic.twitter.com/w6JJUj2PQa
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Then you doubt the integrity of the temperature history data?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @iatetweet
No I doubt the historical causation of CO2 to temperature rise. In fact, temperature spikes drive increases in CO2 because warm oceans outgas it when solubility drops.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.