#ClimateChange Challenge: Review both sides of the argument (2 links each) and tell me which side of the climate debate is more PERSUASIVE.
NASA: https://go.nasa.gov/2la2ISR
Tony Heller: https://bit.ly/2LFpcct
Bloomberg: https://bloom.bg/2hxsT7D
Forbes:https://bit.ly/2LFhajR
-
-
Lindzen and Choi are climate scientists. Work published in 2009. Isn’t the whole point of your challenge that “NASA” as an organization is not to be taken at face value?
-
Some things are easy to check. NASA would know if other forces mapped to the heat trend more closely than CO2.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They seem pretty confident they know what the global average temperature (GAT) was in 1930 even though there are few records outside of a handful of countries. Would not past GAT estimates have increasing levels of uncertainty? Why don't they show that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As Scott might say, “not a credible view”.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.