#ClimateChange Challenge: Review both sides of the argument (2 links each) and tell me which side of the climate debate is more PERSUASIVE.
NASA: https://go.nasa.gov/2la2ISR
Tony Heller: https://bit.ly/2LFpcct
Bloomberg: https://bloom.bg/2hxsT7D
Forbes:https://bit.ly/2LFhajR
-
-
A couple of strong El Niño’s explain the recent rise. If you factor out cooling from Pinatubo eruption and the El Niño’s of 1998 and 2016 there is very little tropospheric warming over the last 20 years.
-
Not a credible view. NASA has examined those effects and they don't match the warming pattern. The people claiming otherwise are "guy on Internet with sketchy chart."
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The rapid warming claimed by scientists.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Rapid? The sea has not risen since we poured concrete 100 years ago. Contrast that with 240 feet rise in a few years after the last ice age.
-
Sea level rises about 2 mm/year. It’s been consistent for as long as we have had tidal gauges.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There is no current rapid rate of warming.pic.twitter.com/BMhm2KMlDQ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems like Heller explains the recent rapid rise in temperature, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.