Oh no! I drank my coffee too early 
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're missing the entire meat of the debate. An educated skeptic doesn't dispute CO2 forces temperature increase. The dispute is whether CO2 increase drives an increase in H2O vapor, and whether that accelerates warming.
-
Considering studies have repeatedly shown that atmospheric CO2 increases have always followed increases in average temperature, it's pretty apparent that this particular trace atmospheric gas isn't the climate-control knob some people insist that it is.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You have to kill the people who produces the most CO2. Thats not the indians, chinese or africans, its mostly the us americans and europeans. Good luck.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Scott, are you a scientist? No.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you think you are saving the world you can justify all sorts of lies and fabrications.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The bulk of impact studies use RCP8.5 as "Business as usual", but that case is bogus, assumes recarbonization of the world economy. Also check the REMSS comment about model drift away from data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tony Heller and Anthony Watts for the skeptic team. Gavin Schmidt and Michael Mann for the warmists. Good luck with getting the latter two to agree to it.
-
Tony Heller, yes, but then I'd choose Roger Tallbloke since he can explain stuff in layman's terms and he also understands Ned Nikolov's theory.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.