#ClimateChange Challenge: Review both sides of the argument (2 links each) and tell me which side of the climate debate is more PERSUASIVE.
NASA: https://go.nasa.gov/2la2ISR
Tony Heller: https://bit.ly/2LFpcct
Bloomberg: https://bloom.bg/2hxsT7D
Forbes:https://bit.ly/2LFhajR
-
-
I know the argument ... and disagree with the concept and the alleged cause (CO2) it just isn't logical the manmade portion of .04% of the atmosphere is a danger to our well being --besides Pot grows best at 600ppm of CO2 in a nursery
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and government paid 'scientists' say a lot of things -- thus we are back to personal experience and logic.. just saying
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
yep & as glaciers melt, water levels rise, but land also rises,,,We manage to live in Minot and Phoenix,,,Look at who makes money and gets political power off Climate Alarmism...Still waiting for any of the computer Climate 'Models' to work accurately in reverse
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.