Things you never see in the news (2): Climate scientists and skeptical scientists TOGETHER debating climate models.
-
-
Finding evidence that falsifies a theory is one way to eliminate a bad model. Phlogiston and ether theories were eliminated by experiment, not debate.
-
Thank you for reminding this. For the same reason, a science that fails to predict is no science at all, no matter what economists or climatologists tell you

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, another way to eliminate a bad economic model is to have enough people lose money on it to realize they need a new one. People, businesses, organizations, and governments are investing now based on implicit and explicit bets on climate models. Some will win, some will lose.
End of conversation
-
-
-
All of modern engineering and medicine depends on good models that replaced bad models. Take a look at the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superseded_theories_in_science … and tell me which models were deprecated by debate, instead of evidence and experiment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you can’t survive the skeptics you don’t really have a point...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scott your ignorance is showing. Science is a process for creating and validating models. If the model fails a prediction, it’s discarded. If it predicts it’s kept. You’re “reality filter” concept is like science, but without rigorous testing and validation.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.