-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
probably because there are no legitimate climate scientists who are also skeptical of the science, because the science is as settled as you can get.
-
Your bubble problem is what I'm trying to fix. You don't even know such scientists exist.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
or people who use the 97% claim countered by people who reveal it never was that to begin with
-
Cook's 97% claim is based on 11,944 scientific studies. His team analyzed all & only used "Explicitly" results. So 986/1010=97%. Really only 986/11944 explicitly agree (8%). Maybe you could justify counting the 2910 implicit for GW so it could be 3896/11944 for 32%. 32%<>97%pic.twitter.com/DbUdiSiL5R
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Someone teach Scott how to thread.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Talking through people is much easier (and probably more lucrative in today's environment) than an honest dialog.
#GoodtimesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It’s supoosed to be 97%, and that’s a hoax. Even if they did, science is not a democracy. 97% of scientists used to believe the earth was flat. https://youtu.be/SSrjAXK5pGw
End of conversation
-
-
-
Climate skeptics have to attend climate conferences their own nickel.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.