Yes, we would. We would complain, just as China would. But we'd have a lot of explaining to do for why we were harboring someone twenty-times worse than Bin Laden. We'd want that news topic to go away. Starting a war over it would be last choice on the list.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Simply complain? No sanctions, no increased military presence, No travel ban, tariffs, no UN sanctions? No increased rhetoric leading to possible confrontations?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AubreyMacLeod1
Maybe not even complain. They don't need the trouble and they don't need to be known as
#Fentanylchina. They would be far better off saying it was a suicide.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
I think you are over simplifying a very complicated issue. I don't believe for a second that 1. China wouldn't respond. 2. The day after you kill 100 fentanyl dealers, 120 more will take their place. Too much money. Use political leverage to get China to do more.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AubreyMacLeod1 @ScottAdamsSays
Your argument has changed from "WW3 will be the response" to "they would do a little more than complain." Scott didn't even have to pace you to lead you to his conclusion. And you still aren't aware you agree. But you still dont like it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Munchensenton @ScottAdamsSays
Response, and escalation, are how wars start. And when did I agree with going to another sovereign country, finding their citizens guilty without trial, and kill them? It simply would not have the desired outcome.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AubreyMacLeod1 @ScottAdamsSays
Wars don't start that way between countries whose economies are dependent on their biggest customer continuing to buy stuff from you and make regular interest payments.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Munchensenton @ScottAdamsSays
You also do not go into a valued trading partner's country and kill their citizens, won't happen. You use political pressure to motivate them to do more. And they def need to do more.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AubreyMacLeod1 @Munchensenton
What do you do after political pressure fails? How long do let them keep killing 30,000 Americans per year? Five years? Ten?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Munchensenton
How many years would the US wait before allowing another Government to come to the US to kill US citizens that they believe are criminals? Also where there is a market, there will be a supplier. Killing Chinese dealers won't eradicate fentanyl.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I accept your intellectual surrender.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Munchensenton
LOL, well at least you have a sense of humor.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Translation for "I accept your intellectual surrender": I'm pretending I won, because your point is unassailable.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.