Ding ding ding- you win! And you don’t even have to have good science as long as the conclusion says the right thing.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
They do "special" math
-
Everyone working in this field - Swedes, Chinese people, people in Israel, USA and Argentina, over the last 40 years, none of them know what they are doing? Hmm... Not sure about that. Bunch of Jesus freaks in USA .. tell us what's true, real, or fake !?!pic.twitter.com/qxUZ44XGBc
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Use basic logic: Who guarantees you perpetual 3% growth?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is a basic demand for a climate scientist, not being a scientist (cc Michael Mann) and not being able to do math.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And, coincidentally, have more financial resources to alleviate whatever issues result from the potential of rising global temperatures.
-
No, there is a net cost associated with having to relocate an entire societies and their infrastructure that dirty growth can't make up for. The report is good, it's all factored in, don't take Scott's word for it, the reports are public, so are sources: https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The answer of no is settled science
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.