Hypothesis: People who read the most fiction are primed to assign meaning to anecdotal evidence because fiction treats every observation as meaningful. Reality is nearly the opposite.pic.twitter.com/06arkEcG4Q
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
How is "fiction reduces bias" NOT saying that it increases critical thinking skills? Nice job citing wikipedia and Psych. Today, but as an actual straight-A psych student, I assure you your use of schema and priming here are skewed. (1/3)
The problem with your assertion is that is treats all data as objective. And at times data IS objective, of course, but it is SUBjective more often than you'd think. (2/3)
If you don't think that lots of science has been done with a western bias then you've got plenty of homework worth doing. (3/3)
For example - you’re citing the notion of schema, a term from psych, a field that works with multiple - often conflicting - theories of mind. And specifically, ‘schema’ comes from western psych (not to say that eastern doesn’t have parallels tho, of course)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.