They read a lot of fiction.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @JacobAWohl
So how do you explain that the Democrats just elected a bunch of scientists to Congress, and that Republicans don't seem to accept even established scientific ideas like evolution and climate change? Seems like kind of a huge, gaping flaw in your argument, dude.
3 replies 0 retweets 112 likes -
Replying to @sctadsen @JacobAWohl
The hypothesis is not "scientists are mostly Republicans." The hypothesis is that reading fiction wires you differently than non-fiction. Scientists read both. Liberal arts majors might read mostly fiction, and would lean Democrat.
8 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Damn Dilbert Guy, it took you a full day to come up with that response...and it’s still mostly nonsense. Leave it to the literal scientists like myself to handle falsifiable hypotheses, okay?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
How much fiction do you read? Feels like a lot.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Feels like you're not addressing the flaws in your hypothesis.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Did you do a controlled study to find those flaws or are they...confirmation bias because you were primed by reading a lot of fiction?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.