Hi @ScottAdamsSays ,
Just curious if you happened to notice if the pollution and greenhouse gases created by the wild fires have increased, decreased, or moderated the temperature at your house based on your observation?
-
-
This is one of the big flaws in climate science, BTW.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one can ever answer what the "optimal" temperature of the planet should be for life, and humans in particular. It's because they have no idea.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who will ever know that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Weather models. Duh. (Yes, yes, it's a joke.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Check the temperature in your zip code for this time of year going back 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 years ago. http://www.wunderground.com maintains historical records. We both know you won't, though -- evidence isn't persuasive enough for the Master
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is flawed. All the carbon releasesd by the fires were sucked out of the atmosphere by the plant life. The fire is carbon neutral.
-
The amount of CO2 in his neighborhood before the fire was significantly less than it was after the fire. If "climate science" holds true, the temperature in his neighborhood should have increased with the increase in CO2.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When we had the Canadian fires this past summer, I just looked at http://weather.gov or http://weather.com The actual temperature was always about 10°F lower than the forecast. They never accounted for the fires impact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.