This is the “lack of imagination” problem I described on Periscope today. How many other interpretations are there for this situation? I can think of several more likely than this one.https://twitter.com/NGrossman81/status/1061989085231935488 …
-
-
Scott typically attempts to “win” discussion by throwing out some logical fallacy identifier, or some cute fallacy diagnostic term he created. It’s a type of ad-hom: attack the person and not their argument. It means he has nothing, and a sign of weakness.
-
The second part of your tweet is fighting with the first part.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.