Suppose you are on a Board interviewing an applicant for a permanent legal position. At least two women make sexual assault allegations under penalty of perjury. During the job interview he yells at you & makes some false statements. Would you hire him?
#SaturdayMorning Thoughts
-
-
I'd be a little more concerned with what
@tedlieu thought about Kavanaugh if he hadn't already announced his disdain for him within 5 minutes of his nomination. His opinion now is moot. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Let's calibrate your honesty guage: What is boofing and the devil's triangle?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Analogies are not persuasive.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Presumably when wrongfully & viciously attacked, Ted wud have given a mild Dukakis-style response that wud have disgusted everyone and convinced no one of his innocence. Quick to criticize, Dems ALWAYS have trouble w/ the never-asked-by-MSM question: "What would you do?" Jerks!
End of conversation
-
-
-
...and have some of the interviewers stated in no uncertain terms they will not hire anyone presented to them regardless of who the candidates are?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree that ‘tens of millions of people been persuaded by the media into thinking they need to stop this job applicant at any cost’ but nonetheless ur answer is non responsive to assertion that applicant was being significantly untruthful even if unknowable on primary allegation
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.