Incorrect. You wouldn’t do it if you were intentionally lying. But you might do it if you trusted your own imperfect memory. Our memories are partial reconstructions. That’s the only option that explains all facts in evidence. But we can never know.https://twitter.com/GeorgeTakei/status/1042528309219864576 …
-
-
Sure, repeatedly associating with notorious sex offenders doesn't make him personally guilty of anything. But the question is whether he's that guy, whether he should be seated on SCOTUS. There's a reason this through-line of evidence would be admissible in a court.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.