-
-
Replying to @Bernd__Neuner @AnnaBurkhart
Lemme guess, NOT a brutal torturor who uses chemical weapons on his own people?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @raincoaster @AnnaBurkhart
So you found that proof for the use of CW which the
#OPCW failed to - the first time they really tried on scene, not relying on "activists"
? Yes, the Syrian government tortured - for the West also ... - but it's by far not the only party.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bernd__Neuner @AnnaBurkhart
"By far not the only party"??? Oh come on. If this is the best you can do you must be exhausted. Go get some rest. Take some time off.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @raincoaster @AnnaBurkhart
No double standards, that simple. "... his own people (paid and armed by hostile governments)" is a convenient label to stigmatize political enemies - what
@ScottAdamsSays calls a "linguistic kill shot". We need to move beyond labels.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You're quoting The Dilbert Guy as if he's a statesman. I mean, i love a lowered bar myself, but that's just too low. Have some pride in your work!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's about the psychology of persuasion, not statesmanship (another empty label, btw).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Persuade me that Dilbert Guy is a psychologist then
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Nope, I won't even try to change your belief that only psychologists are qualified to discuss persuasion - and a trained hypnotist is not
Labeling @ScottAdamsSays "the Dilbert guy" is a nice example of the killshot technique, btw, trying to reduce him to one aspect.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Scott Adams literally has no other qualifications. He's rich, self-promotional, and The Dilbert Guy.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
"Psychologist" would not be sufficient qualifications for what I write about. That's one layer of the talent stack.
-
-
Ooooh senpai noticed you Bernd.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.