Scott Adams talks about Trump’s UK visit, Russian hackers, and the Republican brand. With delicious coffee.https://www.pscp.tv/w/bhoCSzExODgwMjU5fDFCZEdZb0RtWGpCeFgooUSMNr3a0kXcNl-PjsPxeoqC2PKTIkJHQhNW1ow9AA== …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Hardcore Schism Retweeted Scott Adams
If Republicans accept the progressive framing that a Republican needs to say they aren't racist, it implicitly defines the default of a Republican as racist. Once you accept that framing, you're selling out your allies on the right. You might end up raw and alone.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1018142585200623616 …
Hardcore Schism added,
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I see the implicit assumption as NOT all Republicans are all racists. Hence the request to confirm it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Jj20101
Hardcore Schism Retweeted AG
You have that backwards. BLM believes Republican policies prove racism. Support for law and order proves racism. BLM doesn't care that some people were lawfully shot by police; they don't care about law and order. They want Repubs to give that up.https://twitter.com/AG_Conservative/status/1018148237088382976 …
Hardcore Schism added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You wouldn't be asked to disavow racism if the assumption is that "NOT all Republicans are racist". If you're being asked to disavow something because you have a label next to your name, that label itself leads to projection of negative affect.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I agree with the concept you describe. And I rate it far, far lower in power than a million Republicans publicly disavowing racism.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.