It is reasonable to be skeptical of photos, including these. Calling them and the source organization ‘not credible’ is not general skepticism - it is a specific claim that requires specific evidence.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
“Not one credible source is mentioned” -Scott Adams making the specific claim that specific sources are not credible with no evidence.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
General photo skepticism is not tantamount to the statement that any particular photo is not credible.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Hah, you’re free to tell yourself that, but it doesn’t make it so. It remains true that he made a specific claim that 38 North, *and* specific photos, are not credible but provided no evidence, just a boring platitude about all photos. Sad show from the grand persuader...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @samuelcrees @Iggy_Semmelweis
Who has to prove photos are not credible in 2018? You need Captain Obvious for that job.
8:19 PM - 3 Jul 2018
2 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.