For all your followers who are misunderstanding this interaction:https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1010766731826958336 …
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Except... sure you can. In plenty of situations.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The word "hypocrisy" is a built in oxymoron, when used in reference to someone else.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On the other hand: 1. Liberals often argue from a claimed position of moral superiority. If you don't point out the flaws in their claim, principally their moral hypocrisies, then you are conceding their premise and the battle is already half-lost. (1/2)
-
And 2. Liberals are often immune to logic but extremely sensitive to ridicule. Thus, one charge of hypocrisy can be far more effective than a mountain of facts and logic. (2/2)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It seems like the go to rebuttal if someone points out hypocrisy is to call it a whataboutism without actually addressing the meat of the argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if it’s your goal is to prove all sides are guilty and nobody can be trusted? Does the hypocrisy argument work in this case?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.