Realistically, the "Wall" was always going to be "whatever works best," and that changes with technology. This approach makes sense for A-B testing. Let's see how it does on one segment.https://twitter.com/jamueac/status/1008434895809662978 …
-
-
I can't imagine anyone disapproving "what's works best" -- especially if A-B testing is involved.
-
Yeah, you would hope so, but I suspect that message would've been mocked mercilessly during the primaries. Unfortunately, A/B testing to optimize policy doesn't connect that well emotionally to the majority of the electorate. That is why "the Wall" really means a physical Wall.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
And there it is. Comparing the US experience with its neighbors to the Israeli experience is a ver poor analogy. Mexico and Canada are not threatening the very existence of the US.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I appreciate the response. IMO the Wall was always just a device to win an election and never a serious proposal. Yet I went to rallies in 2016 and it was clear that a physical wall (paid for by Mexico) was fully expected by many. How is this technique productive to governing?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unfortunately, the Wall is the only major infrastructure project likely to overcome the dysfunctional political structure in the next recession. The Chinese went for ghost city building spree after 2008. Old trick in nation state management book.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.