The problem is that the counter-argument is “that’s a lie,” but stupid people don’t understand that you cannot spend all day explaining basic economics to people who start from the assumptions of the lie in the first instance and are thus uneducable. https://twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/1005922978863992833 …
-
-
Man, I called this one easily
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No idea what that means. Sorry. I just volunteered rigorous empirical analyses of our trade agreements (among many others easily found on Google). Deciding if the evidence/analysis is "fair" - a subjective term - is up to you.
-
I don’t think he was looking for “rigorous empirical analyses”.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You could trust the expert opinion of someone who spent a lifetime researching the topic as opposed to an easy-to-read article that allows you to pass judgment on something for which you have little knowledge. Just a thought.....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you give up on reading them already?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You have to be the laziest ornery commentator for
#Trumpism. Here is trade situation with Canada, in simple terms, written by Office of US Trade Representative (i.e. an Executive Office of the President). I also included a tariff summary for TL;DR types. https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/americas/canada …pic.twitter.com/4wqwYKYXsZ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.