I agree with that if their innocence is certain and they lived crime-free lives after their acquittals. Otherwise it gets messy for a tough-on-crime President.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HawkofNewYork @realDonaldTrump
Reading up on the situation now. Gets muddy because Trump’s ad was anti-crime in general. Didn’t even mention the case. Plus he doesn’t apologize (general rule) and there is nothing to pardon because cases were vacated.
2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes -
And as recently as 2016 he still thought they might be guilty. But I agree some sort of gesture would be helpful.
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Yes, as recently as 2016. Do you know when and why the five subjects' convictions were overturned? 2002, on DNA evidence. Yet, fourteen years later, Trump WAS STILL PERSECUTING THEM. Based on this, are there any conclusions we can draw about Trump? Or would that be mind reading?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Yes, you can conclude it is fair to ask him his current opinion while noting your points. Beyond that is mind-reading.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.