That's not what happened here. If this was the 1st & only time she said something racist, her intentions could be open to discussion & a sincere apology would likely have been enough. Given her history, her intentions were clear. At some point, society has to draw a line.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1001980722050162688 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I haven't followed Roseanne's career closely but has she ever been known before this to be a racist? News to me.
-
Just a small subset of her past activities. https://www.vox.com/2018/5/29/17406014/roseanne-racism-abc-trump-twitter …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn’t misinterpretation the provocateur’s aim?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scott - your work is multi-layered, often complex and is interpreted through the filter of the reader. I would never presume to know everything you meant. However, in this case, Maya Angelou's statement holds true. "When people tell you who they are, believe them."
-
What happens when the person tells my Yanny and tells you Laurel, which is the most typical situation we see? See the problem?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder how much of misinterpretations are projection.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.