Oh wow so surprising they ripped off our shit 
lol @ SX"OS" violating Atmosphere's GPLv2 license. Not that that's surprising, I guess....https://twitter.com/hexkyz/status/1012149398929735681 …
Sneak peak of TX's enterprise-ready filesystem layer totally developed from scratch!
But why does it look so familiar?
"embeddedfs:/titles/%016lx/exefs/main.npdm" 
pic.twitter.com/sHMUi7jT0C
pic.twitter.com/sHMUi7jT0C-
-
-
Our lazy info instructor always told: "If somebody already wrote the code, take it" But it was foreseeable that SX never would credit anyone let alone publishing the source
-
I mean they're not wrong, for big project and public things, but like.... If you want to keep your shit hidden, do it from scratch and don't just use shitty rotating ciphers etc Could have at least used cool obfuscation methods like x-mapped kernel or relocating state machines
-
the obfuscation is actually really annoying, you wouldn't want to unpack it manually
-
Gonna write the whole thing up? I'd love to see it.
-
we likely will at some point!
-
"we" being you and
@hexkyz? I'm excited to see it! -
indeed :)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It's Gateway all over again lmao
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The people making software for pirates literally pirated the software to claim as their own for other pirates to use. Lol that’s pathetic TX.
-
Aaaaand bricks other people's consoles if their software is pirated in turn. The hypocrisy is strong with this one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good luck getting your fake Stallman license to mean anything in court.
-
Care to elaborate why exactly you think GPL won't hold up in court? https://qz.com/981029/a-federal-court-has-ruled-that-an-open-source-license-is-an-enforceable-contract/ … There's a source with legal precedent (in US courts) that use of open-source material is an implicitly agreed license contract. Breach of licensing is a breach of contract.
-
Even if we take China out of the equation, you have to prove *actual damages* for the case to be worth anything. And what actual damages (monetary) have been done? It would cost more to litigate than it is worth, again, even without the international law thrown into the mix.
-
Monetary damages only really have to be proven if you seek monetary compensation. They could easily say "release your source in compliance with the licensing agreement or be held in contempt of court" (using US court as a reference, I'm aware international law complicates things)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lol, can you guys do something about this unbelievable steal?
-
do something? a piracy group stealing other piracy group? lol
-
lmao, sciresM and piracy don't get along.
-
Its a weird question xD
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for the code. Without it I wouldn't be enjoying my sx right now
-
You may enjoy a brick one of those days :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.