Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ScientiaPercept

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ScientiaPercept

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. ruj 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    You DO realize there are over 40 isotopes used in dating. How about if I use an isotope with a 10 minute half life to show you are 20 minutes old?

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Kinda like that time they used the wrong dating method on volcanic rocks from the Mt. St. Helens eruption to show that radio dating is flawed. Well yeah, duh, of course it is if you do it wrong.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. ruj 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Accepting evolution has nothing to do with a belief or lack of belief in a deity.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. pro 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Personally I think it takes far more faith to believe in evolution than it does God. No person alive in all of history has seen a cat have a puppy or a dog have a cat or any other animal for that matter. You have faith that it happened because it can't be proven

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    I know you think you made a point here but science has proven nothing that says creation is wrong. It actually takes far more faith to believe in evolution than creation. Go read The Case for Creation by Lee Strobel Ex-Athiest

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 9 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    you forgot - a bizarrely unsuccessful American businessman, brash television personality, (un)intentional , , sympathizer, honorary Russian Cossack, wrestling personality, WWE Hall of Famer, , and personality-cult leader, and idiot.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    7. ruj 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima

    You keep saying that, but you have not demonstrated it. It means as much as "Life is strongly emergent. As such, it requires a team of tiny mutants with tiny tools." I could say that over and over, but that wouldn't make it true.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. ruj 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Life evolved regardless of what you say.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. ruj 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    All significant and replicable evidence in all applicable scientific disciplines science rebuts your argument. But yeah, besides that you’re right.

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    I’ll ask again whilst you are present, are domestic cats and tigers from a common ancestor on the ark as you have suggested previously?

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. srp 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Not only does he not understand elementary geology, he rejects the entire discipline of geology.

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    8. srp 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. ruj 2019.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Here’s some feedback: you’re an idiot. The evidence for evolution is utterly undeniable, and anybody who DOES try to deny it is doing so out of fear of the consequences: you think if evolution is true your god isn’t and therefore there is no life after death. Man up, Lee.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 12 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Denied science in favor of pseudoscience? Yes. He has done that more than once.

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 12 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    I don't think DoJ wants to rape children. He just doesn't know what we know about what's in the Bible.

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 14 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    There is no argument anymore against evolution. The only remaining debate argument, regarding origins, is how did abiogenesis create life. Debate against evolution is primarily a religious function.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    Regress as comeback or regress as mental deterioration? The latter would make Ash's opinions about you factual.

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 23 sata
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    How does this argument go? 1. The universe is here and encompasses everything that exists. 2. We haven’t the faintest idea how it came about. 3. Therefore something that is not in the universe, and so cannot exist, created the universe.

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    There’s a difference between the ‘we’re in the matrix’ theory and there being a ‘god’, and at no point has NDT ever in any way said there is one.

    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 15 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    The statement “All fossilized creatures appear suddenly and fully formed in the rock record, with no clear history of evolutionary transitions.” Is categorically false. Even you know the source is biased. Can you send something from a non religious entity?

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·