Brain + Mind

@ScienceyMcMind

Science Research Puzzled.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2019.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ScienceyMcMind

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ScienceyMcMind

  1. 26. sij

    Kobe Bryant wasn't even a Top-50 player FACTS

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Cambridge psychologist has a paper coming out on the correlation between status anxiety and moral condemnation (r = .42). He continuously has good stuff on his Twitter, too:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Girls exposed to atypically high levels of testosterone in the womb engage in more male-typical play; boys who produce atypically low levels of testosterone engage in less. See Figure 1, CAH (females) and 5α-RD-2 (males).

    Poništi
  4. 20. sij
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    "Certainly, you can make up adaptationist explanations for pretty much anything. But you can make up sociocultural explanations for pretty much anything too. Why should the sociocultural explanations win by default?"

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    25. pro 2019.

    If you want to be rewarded, you have to be irreplaceable. If you want to be irreplaceable, you have to be unique. If you want to be unique, you have to be authentic. If you want to be authentic, stop listening to everyone and everything else. It’s drowning “you” out.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Rule 1: The more you overreact w/some, the less you need to react w/others. As w/the IRS: increase the penalty & lower your audit rate. Rule 2: when a fraud fucks w/you, say , , , or , keep busting them for decades!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. pro 2019.

    Men: Haha, we have better mental rotation skills! Also men: Help, I cannot wrap a sheet of paper around this cube and am tangled up in tape.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. pro 2019.

    New paper “An Introduction to Complex Systems Science and its Applications”--“assumes only a high school mathematical and scientific background, so that it may be accessible to ... anyone who is interested in systems and society”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. pro 2019.

    Calling someone a “cognitive proletarian” but in such a way as to leave ambiguous whether it’s intended as a classist sneer denoting common stupidity or a term of compliment to a sharp mind of exceptional revolutionary clarity

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. pro 2019.

    "Nondominant boys are rarely excluded from play but are made to feel the inferiority of their status positions in no uncertain terms. And since hierarchies fluctuate, every boy gets his chance to be victimized and must learn to take it."

    Poništi
  12. 13. pro 2019.
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    12. pro 2019.

    menaquinone made this sitting at his kitchen table in 2015. it started a huge fight on r/catholicism and everything in it is still repeated now.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. pro 2019.

    Nerds have completely ruined fantasy. Wizards used to be philologists who knew the languages of animals and nature, and poetry was the essence of magic. Todays its all sexy elf wizards with D&D style powers of shooting fireballs. Modern fantasy is terrible.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. pro 2019.

    Anyone who says this proves their own ignorance. Fantasy was a product of post-kantian literary aesthetics. Fantasy literature began as a philosophical-historical project to unify German cultural history. The brothers Grimm were legal historians. Tolkien was just copying Ossian

    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    K Popper. The poverty of historicism. In 1944 he distinguishes between predicting timely occurrence of events vs understanding the space of possibilities and strategize around it. The former prediction is imposible in social sciences. The latter is posible if we get fat-tails.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. pro 2019.

    Serious question: Why do sociologists consider inequality more interesting than equality? Equality is less likely to occur by random chance so in a way it's more anomalous and surprising.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. stu 2019.

    “As soon as you stop paying a monthly fee, everything is taken away. The co-living resident is nothing more than a passthrough for capital, temporarily holding onto wealth as it moves from their boss’s bank account to their landlord’s.”

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·