Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @Sci_Hub
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @Sci_Hub
-
Prikvačeni tweet
Sci-Hub: the true solution to the Open Access problem sci-hub.iopic.twitter.com/gDdQ0ff9nQ
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
do you want to see what the very first Sci-Hub download statistics looked alike? here http://sci-hub.se/downloads/ancient.sci-hub.stats.7z … Sci-Hub stats from 2011 to 2013 are available for analysispic.twitter.com/lg0yvlJZNv
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Do you want to see what very first Sci-Hub code was? Here is the backup version back from 2011 http://github.com/freescience/Sci-Hub-2011 … it is very different from Sci-Hub today, but worked very well
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Today is 5 September and Sci-Hub is 8 years old. In eight years, the website grew from zero to 76,000,000 research articles available for free reading, and from 2,000 users per day to 400,000.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
When someone says Sci-Hub is illegal: Sci-Hub is real open knowledge, that works here and now. Sci-Hub is considered to be not legal = open knowledge is not legal in current law. Why cannot everyone see this simple truth?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sci Hub proslijedio/la je Tweet
Sometimes
@Twitter's recommendation algorithm gets things hilariously wrong. I can assure you that fans of@Sci_Hub will most emphatically NOT like@ElsevierConnect
pic.twitter.com/ZpUPfbyTTM
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
There are also good news: despite all the efforts against it, Sci-Hub grew: currently there are > 400,000 visitors daily, reaching more than half a million sometimes. The statistics will be published later
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
that is ironical how publishers are talking about Sci-Hub being 'unethical' just because it uses passwords to download research literature, but they find their SLANDER on Sci-Hub completely ethical
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Publishers are madly trying to BADMOUTH Sci-Hub to win their battle. They are trying to present Sci-Hub as espionage tool and etc. Do you think that is ethical? Do the ends justify the means?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
regradless of the fact that Assange could be a Russian spy, as media are portaying him, the only crime he is actually prosecuted for was accessing and publishing some information. not killing anyone, etc. information should not be prosecuted in a democracy, or not?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
interesting paper on the need to reform intellectual property laws: Beyer, J. L. (2013). The Emergence of a Freedom of Information Movement: Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Pirate Party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 141–154. http://sci-hub.se/10.1111/jcc4.12050 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The main rhetoric used against Sci-Hub goes like: yes sharing knowledge is good, but Sci-Hub is bad, because it is illegal. Don't buy it. Any country can easily make Sci-Hub legal by fixing the law, if they really want to support open knowledge
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Because in our times people cannot trust information published in media, I decided to create a separate page with basic facts about Sci-Hub and myself: http://engineuring.wordpress.com/2019/03/31/sci-hub-and-alexandra-basic-information … I will add important information to this page and duplicate on Sci-Hubpic.twitter.com/wY3Gt6TocT
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
We need a worldwide court reform to have better courts that will not ban people from reading research literature
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sci Hub proslijedio/la je Tweet
A French court just decided that the main French ISPs must block Sci-Hub - French scientists and students will have more problems to get what they needhttps://www.nextinpact.com/news/107689-les-principaux-fai-francais-doivent-bloquer-sci-hub-et-libgen.htm …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Many people now are requesting Sci-Hub for legal documents and for paywalled newspaper articles, too!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Wikipedia is hysterical about new copyright laws and they are going to block their website for European users on March, 21st http://blackout21.eu/en/index.html
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Karen Uhlenbeck is the first woman to receive Abel Prize in math. These four K. Uhlenbeck's research articles are closed-access and can be read on Sci-Hub only: http://doi.org/10.1016/0393-0440(92)90053-4 …, http://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0069763 …, http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01388715 … and http://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160390714 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
turns out, the whole Web was created 30 years ago to free academic information. Should academic publishers be banned from using the Web then, because they corrupt the whole purpose of the Web? via
@opensciencepic.twitter.com/WoyyaowmD8
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
In 2018 Norwegian institutions paid around € 9 million in Elsevier subscription costs. The agreement with Elsevier will not be renewed for 2019https://www.mynewsdesk.com/no/unit/pressreleases/norwegian-research-institutions-have-decided-not-to-renew-their-agreement-with-elsevier-2846284 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Noticed that Wikipedia articles about Sci-Hub are written in such a way to create negative impression about Sci-Hub. and positive about publishers.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.