Tomorrow: on to the next sentence!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can read 35 papers in 6 hours?
-
I once read 5 in 2 hours. That's my personal high score.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
only to have the press make a big deal out of the humorous speculation you made at the very end of the paper, ignoring all the actual science. (cough-cough-alien-megastructure)
-
And space dinosaurs!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do what Trump does: make it up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is all wrong (Smith et al. 2006, Ng et al. 2014, and references therein).
-
Thanks for suggesting citing that under-appreciated 2006 paper.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. Which is also the definition of insanity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I also see the author’s full name to confer some respect. And if it’s a female author, I say “that’s what she said” with a bit of sass while typing out the citation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.