Didn't take you for the type that would be a FUD spreader.
-
-
-
Where's the FUD? That Ethereum is hacker paradise? That's been proven a few times already.
-
Just saying that you're implying that a coin that peaked at around $38B total valuation is worthless because its not secure. Nice msg!
-
Did I say it's worthless? The internet was hacker paradise when it first came out.
-
So are you helping the situation or making it worse?
-
I don't think they affect this situation at all. People who lost money still lost money. Hopefully, it will spur people to be more careful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
inb4
@VitalikButerin responds -
This has nothing to do with Vitalik nor Gav. It's just that it's hard to write secure smart contracts no matter who you are.
-
Your post didn't come off as if you were generalizing smart contracts as unsafe but more attacking Ethereum. From my POV that's how it read
-
Well for now, Ethereum represents the largest turing-complete smart contract platform.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Gunning for that #2 spot eh charlie?
-
What do you mean? LTC has always been #2. ;P
-
How them ltc smart contracts coming along? =P
-
They are still pretty dumb. Not smart yet.
-
Oh well, at least simple is secure eh?
-
For money, simple and secure is best.
-
Can't like this enough!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I do not think Gav wrote the vulnerable code. Look at the commit history.
-
I just look at the author of the source. Commits could be because the repo was moved.
-
Afaik Gav made original contract, but updates were from someone else (the vulnerable updates).
-
Btw your post is so dirty , It's not helpful for community
-
Isn't that a good thing if the ICO community is crazy?
-
he just blame someone else for no reason and is not even his fault
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.