The research I contributed to earlier this year likely caused SwissPost some economic harm (they had to suspend e-voting operations and thus couldn't deliver on contracts - not to mention the trickle down harm). Was that research ethical?https://twitter.com/SarahJamieLewis/status/1113133737250717696 …
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Would I have been able to (technically / legally) do that research if the various open source projects had adopted a form a "do no harm" license?
Prikaži ovu nit -
Not to mention the long history of abuse of the primum non nocere to argue against everything from abortion to elective surgeries. There is a reason why in multiple modern revisions of oath have never actually inserted those words.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Tweet je nedostupan.Prikaži ovu nit
-
Mill's Harm Principle or the Wiccan rede would both be far more robust foundations to build a morally-aware open source movement on. If you harm none, then do what you will....Otherwise...<insert the actual hard work of defining moral & ethical principles>
Prikaži ovu nit -
Every practical ethical dilemma is rooted, not in whether to inflict harm but, in deciding which harm is least worst to inflict.
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Is this related, or serendipitous?https://twitter.com/CoralineAda/status/1175847915522334727?s=19 …
-
Let's call it...inspired by the zeitgeist.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Why so?
-
Because it isn't much of a standard to act on, but I think that is the point. The first test being on any action you take being harmful and weighing that against inaction. Some people manage to screw that up.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.