The big upside are the very low latencies of the Starlink constellation, due to the very low altitude LEO satellites. Security of transmissions is primarily the function of military grade encryption on top of the Starlink connection - this can be done over any public network.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
-
Couldn't this potentially paint a target on the back of a start-of-the-art network and harm its success? All in the name of claiming "military grade communication"? I'm not sure this is such a good thing
Just my thoughts. -
On the other hand, the us government will help keep it safe.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Been doing it for nearly a year now along with all the other branches including the US Coast Guard.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I feel this is a bad decision because of hackers gaining access. The Pentagon can't keep them out of their hen house. Basically, I'm most worried about comsec regarding the lives of soldiers in the field.
-
US army probably encrypts all their traffic, so it wont matter if someone "gains access"
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
I guess this is all starting to make sense as to why he's allowed to pollute the air with them. There was always another set of reason's I'm sure. UFO satelites don't last long. And was only 11 or so of them. I'm sure this vastly improves things.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Well, that's puts in perspective the Huawei vs Starlink war. It's a fight for who is going spy on us, China or USA.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.