Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce SamoBurja
Samo Burja
Samo Burja
Samo Burja
@SamoBurja

Tweets

Samo Burja

@SamoBurja

There has never been an immortal society. Figuring out why. Founder of Bismarck Analysis. Bylines in @TheNatlInterest @palladiummag.

San Francisco, CA
samoburja.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: siječanj 2018.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
    • Prijavi Tweet

    Samo Burja je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceVenkatesh Rao

    One like = One Opinion on Wisdom and Madness of Crowdshttps://twitter.com/vgr/status/1207151830339162114 …

    Samo Burja je dodan/na,

    Venkatesh Rao @vgr
    Odgovor korisniku/ci @SamoBurja
    Wisdom/madness of crowds
    20:21 - 17. pro 2019. iz: Slovenija
    • 15 proslijeđenih tweetova
    • 166 oznaka „sviđa mi se”
    • Scu tsunamis rolling across the lives of the innocent vijay Giacomo Randazzo Toby Hoenisch Axel Dessein Jake Gotts Julius Jarlan Indraneel Deshpande
    15 proslijeđenih tweetova 166 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      1. Novi razgovor
      2. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        1. It's become well known Crowds can in some circumstances aggregate information stunningly accurately. An illustrative anecode is Sir Francis Galton's surprise that the crowd at a county fair accurately guessed the weight of an ox when their individual guesses were averaged.

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      3. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        2. What is less well known is that the mechanism of aggregation matters. You might aggregate the information through voting or perhaps a market. It can be as simple as asking many people to cross a park, a clear convenient beaten path emerges from their individual behavior.

        1 proslijeđeni tweet 18 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      4. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        3. Crowds aren't inherently creative, they are well understood as very agressive hill climbing mechanisms. They will be terrible at crossing adaptive valleys.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      5. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        4. Because of this machine learning partially obsoletes the traditional mechanisms of aggregation. Machine learning on big data gathered through mass surveilance pushes against both voting and markets. It enthrones revealed preferences. Whatever moves your behavior, will!

        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      6. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        5. Spot the interesting assumption? You can go very far by analyzing crowds as a tool. Crowds don't set agendas, rather they respond to them. The task of leadership has always been to use social technology to harness crowds.

        1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      7. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        6. Speech giving might be seems as a purely passive activity. One where you are pleasing a crowd. Consider that reading crowds is on of the few ways we can naturally take information about hundreds of people in. An audience when gathered opens themselves up for surveilance.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      8. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        7. A good reality check on the intelligence of crowds is that a hierarchical military unit easily defeats mobs in combat. And this points to an important strength and weakness: Crowds never implement processes or multi step plans. A military unit might!

        6 proslijeđenih tweetova 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      9. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 17. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        8. The industrial revolution was not the consequence of crowds. Rather it was driven by manufacturing process. A team of workers isn't a mob or a crowd.

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      10. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 18. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        9. A natural and surprisingly scaleable method of aggregation is imitation of movement. The movement of people, and hence their emotions are synchronized. A kind of trance. We can see this induced in regimented manner in armies. But also infectiously in mobs and yes cities.

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      11. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 18. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        10. The role of crowds in cities isn't well understood. I would go as far as to say that you don't have a real city without mass gatherings and that it might be main acculturation engine. Ancient Greek Theater and the NYC subway both permanently socially alter participants.

        1 reply 3 proslijeđena tweeta 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      12. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 18. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        11. Different emotions travel differently through physical crowds of different sizes. Joy and bliss seem to lose out to anger and mobilizing aggression as you increase number of gathered beyond 400. Teachers scale their movements often change messages...

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      13. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 18. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        12. Now let's move away from the internal dynamics of crowds to effects of massed attention. Eric S. Raymond suggested that given enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow. I suspect given enough eyeballs all bugs are features. Mass attention *fixates* institutional forms.

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      14. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 18. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        13. Massed crowd attention is damaging to individuals. Forget mechanism, think about the evidence. The numbers for life outcomes of child actors makes them the tragic canary in the coal mine. If fame was a substance it would be outlawed.

        1 reply 4 proslijeđena tweeta 17 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      15. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        14. Two kinds of crowds. Parasocial crowds. These can be simulated. Symbol mediated. Eg viral tweet Physical crowds. Can be induced, but cannot be simulated. Eg Riot in a bread line, brawl in a tavern, a packed NYC subway cart Very different information processing!

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      16. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 20. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        15. Potemkin Crowds. False mass support organizations are common. Fake user bases and counts as well. Physical crowds of people can be faked by governments as well. They can be actors, but logistically easier is civilian clothed security or military personnel.

        0 proslijeđenih tweetova 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      17. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        16. Groupthink is a nice example of the madness of crowds. It leads to failures to accrue information or even its destruction. A somewhat misused term since people call cases of preference falsification groupthink. Let's then first clarify the terms:

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      18. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        17. Preference falsification: Endorsing what is socially desirable. This might be driven by a correct or incorrect appraisal of what the local consensus is on object level beliefs. Groupthink: Changing object level beliefs to match local consensus.

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      19. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        18. You can ameliorate Groupthink by selecting for less influenceable individuals. You can't much ameliorate Preference Falsification through mere selection, since those disagreeable or blind enough to not follow social gradient are disagreeable enough to dissolve groups.

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      20. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        19. Preference Falsification can be tackled by introducing additional social technologies. Either bind the disagreeable together or alter what beliefs the group binds on to ones that are irrelevant for the task at hand. This increases resistance to Groupthink as well.

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      21. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Samo Burja je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceSamo Burja

        20. Potemkin Crowds have four key functions: 1. Induce Groupthink, changing individual beliefs. 2. Craft useful Preference Falsification disrupting organization. 3. Produce legitimacy for decisions. 4. Provide plausible deniability for proxy violence.https://twitter.com/SamoBurja/status/1208006878179086341 …

        Samo Burja je dodan/na,

        Samo Burja @SamoBurja
        15. Potemkin Crowds. False mass support organizations are common. Fake user bases and counts as well. Physical crowds of people can be faked by governments as well. They can be actors, but logistically easier is civilian clothed security or military personnel.
        Prikaži ovu nit
        1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      22. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        Samo Burja je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceSamo Burja

        21. Potemkin Crowds are an example of the tools used to deceive and manage crowds. False Consciousness is the usual term for such tactics. Read up! An example of what Marxist theory gets right. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_consciousness …https://twitter.com/SamoBurja/status/1207163685841575936 …

        Samo Burja je dodan/na,

        Samo Burja @SamoBurja
        5. Spot the interesting assumption? You can go very far by analyzing crowds as a tool. Crowds don't set agendas, rather they respond to them. The task of leadership has always been to use social technology to harness crowds.
        Prikaži ovu nit
        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      23. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        22. Leaders have managed crowds through history, much as one might manage combustible fuel. Most tasks of leadership is one of preventing mobs from forming. But sometimes one wants to combust them. You might want their information processing... or to burn something down.

        1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      24. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        23. While there is high bandwidth communication in physical crowds gathered together, most experiences with crowds online or televised are parasocial. Such one sided relationships can be thought as the equivalent of optical illusions of the social mind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasocial_interaction …

        1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      25. Samo Burja‏ @SamoBurja 21. pro 2019.
        • Prijavi Tweet

        24. Parasocial bonds don't result in much information processing. So if a crowd is mostly parasocial it is rather dumb and doesn't do much processing.

        0 replies 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        Prikaži ovu nit
      26. Kraj razgovora

    Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

    Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

      Sponzorirani tweet

      false

      • © 2020 Twitter
      • O Twitteru
      • Centar za pomoć
      • Uvjeti
      • Pravila o privatnosti
      • Imprint
      • Kolačići
      • Informacije o oglasima