1) Dear @SamHarrisOrg and all asking for proof of Molyneux's alignment with alt-right ideas and his situation with David Duke. This is what I was censored for by Sam, though I sent him this info. I call it how I see it...
-
-
Sam, I have provided proof for my claims: 1) Molyneux and David Duke have a relationship. 2) Molyneux buy his own admission is a Holocaust questioner. He knows how to not cross the line since it's illegal in Canada. 3) Damore did appear on alt-right podcasts. Where was I wrong?
-
small nitpick that doesn't harm your overall point, it's legal in Canada. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_countries_where_Holocaust_denial_is_legal#Canada …
-
this my man, is how you are supposed to respond to fact checkers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sam Harris: Address the *specific claims* you made on my podcast, which I’ve made harder for anyone to find by editing out those specific claims from the podcast.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sam, this is hypocrisy of the highest order. The solution to bad ideas and false claims is to counter them with good ideas and truth, right? So why censor what was said? Why hide it? Keep it there and counter with the truth - if indeed a falsehood was stated....
-
It’s not hypocrisy, it’s caution. You don’t have to allow slander & libel to counter the bad ideas & false claims.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It would seem trivially easy to go after Molyneux for the apparently horrible views he *actually* holds, instead of ones he doesn't. Why not do that instead?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
If you censored unsubstantiated claims by right wingers on your podcast, you wouldn't have a podcast.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You tread a thin line here
@SamHarrisOrg. U claim to not have time to know if@stefanmolyneux is a racist antisemite, but do have time to sift through whether he is specifically a holocaust denier. This semantic delineation is moot with the mountain of evidence that he's a bigot. -
Sam addressed this in his recent podcast. Sam interviewed Molyneux over the phone and he doesn't deny the holocaust. And there isn't any good evidence produced thus far.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How’s the break from social media going?
-
What's the point of asking dumb questions like this? Sam is a public figure and is being called out for work related to that. He'd be skewered for not responding.
-
What’s the point in asking dumb questions you already know the answer to? Blasting off “Hold yourself to a higher standard” is inconsistent with his stated goal of ‘experiments in conversation’ and his reason for the break is that he does not come off well in these exchanges
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes and yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.