Please, I think interviewers of JBP should be aware of his intellectual slight of hand. This guy articulates it well: https://youtu.be/Kbk_4x70OG4 90% of what he says you can agree with but that 10% is what's troubling. And nobody fact-checks his claims.
-
-
-
Bill C-16 never legislated mandatory pronouns. It added transgender to race, sex, religion, in the Human Rights Act. And it's a federal law so only provincial law would impact a university. So much of his claims are built on misleading information or omissions.
-
He talks about women leaving or not choosing high-paying jobs to have children and attributes this to free choice, but omits the fact that most domestic responsibilities are still being expected of mothers. When men aren't expected to do their share, they're free to stay at work.
-
Then there's all his archetype stuff about religion, which is highly flawed. Eurasian civilizations thrived because of "Guns, Germs, and Steel" not "The Hero of A Thousand Faces".
-
And am I really supposed to accept that saying "maybe" women shouldn't wear makeup at work is an honest question or that replying "I don't know" when asked if men and women can work together isn't any different than the old 'I'm just asking questions' tactic used by hucksters?

-
Tweet unavailable
-
Again, he compares a hug to wearing makeup and claims we "don't know the rules", but it's obvious that a hug is an active expression (requiring an interaction and response), while what someone wears is a passive expression (which doesn't force any engagement).
-
Hmmm you make some solid points here
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I heard my name and ran straight over.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Oh, hey, speaking of events, any reservations about continuing on with tonight’s speaking event with Krauss in light of yesterday’s article credibly outing him as a serial predator or is that just the kinda thing you’re cool with?
-
Just realized I sent out that picture multiple times, sorry....Twitter wouldn't send any and they'd disappear. Must have sent them all.
-
Hah. I kinda thought you did it on purpose as a repeated chirping thing.
-
I cannot believe Sam has not publicly disavowed Krauss yet.. Did he say anything about it at the event on Friday with Matt Dillahunty?
-
I don't know if he said anything in the event, but not a peep here. I don't think others have either. Jerry Coyne, for example, who will blog about the latest college SJW, hasn't said anything either.
-
That is extremely disappointing. I swear, someone should pester Mr. Coyne with emails and calls to get his opinion the record. After all, if he's willing to criticizing Milo's Twitter ban for being a racist shit troll in the name of 'free speech'...
-
Haha yeah I forgot about that. I can see somebody like Michael Shermer's, who's been accused of similar behavior to Krauss' (and worse), would want to keep quiet about it, but others, at least acknowledge it, FFS.
-
I stand corrected, Harris did address the Krauss situation by acknowledging the allegations against him:https://youtu.be/_68W43LrQTg
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe “Truth”?..wait, no, we’ll stick with Lobster
-
ya don't get jp started on "truth"...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.