We’re doing ok for a bunch of monkeys. Humanity rocks!
-
-
-
-
Hoping they made Starman so he waves goodbye before the battery diespic.twitter.com/mkIXEsHpXS
-
LONG LIVE SCIENCE!


pic.twitter.com/dyyFZgm4DbThis media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Big deal. We sent a man into space 56 years ago.
-
Oh piss off man. This is nothing like that and you know it.
-
You’re right. This one is unmanned.
-
troll toll. I guess the jet engine wasn’t a big deal then? Bc the Wright Brothers already flew a plane. Why use metal tools when stone tools are available? Why use guns when you can use a bow and arrow? -
False equivalence. If it were a plasma engine, maybe it would be a comparable leap. Elon Musk is a huckster, a very smart one though.
-
The same propulsion system being used doesn’t render the Falcon Heavy irrelevant. Why so much Elon hate?
-
It’s nothing special. Also, you may have forgotten the recent Zuma disaster. Elon Musk has been brilliant at weaseling taxpayer money from shortsighted politicians to fund his money-losing projects. He’s a conman; a more polite Trump, only with better hair restoration.pic.twitter.com/WUR6bBT5j6
-
the envy is strong in this one
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I got chills...
-
Are they multiplying??
-
you know it
-
He's losing control.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
It's electrifying!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The whole video, especially the landing, should be shown in every school in the world. Truly inspiring!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Elon Musk for the Nobel Peace Prize. For being one of the few making an effort to save the human race.
-
He sent in a team of lawyers to plead for the shut down of Diablo Canyon, California's last nuclear reactor. Good for his solar business, but not the planet, as more gas will be used to replace its output.
-
Ask the folks in Fukushima Japan how brilliant nuclear reactors are for the planet
-
How brilliant was the Hindenburg for aviation? No one was, or will ever be killed or harmed by the radiation from the Fukushima incident. If that's the worst a triple meltdown can be, are you seriously in fear of it? Over global warming? Let's compare risks, shall we?
-
Not to mention what Africa and other developing countries are doing. They want to give the same opportunities to their populations as we have had. Solar and will not do it for them. It cannot produce the amount of energy needed to meet the demand. Nuclear is the cleanest.pic.twitter.com/V6nFXsMs4i
-
Ironic that the "we have to consume less" crowd, are the same people promoting the "only" solution to be wind and solar. We need to mine the entire planet, and then cover it all with turbines and PV to save it? Sorry, it's mad. PERIOD.
-
Believe me I'm all for clean energy. If fusion power was around the corner, I'd say jump on that bandwagon, but right now we cannot afford to be complacent as you stated. Many nuclear scientists have improved on the old technologies and can make nuclear plants even safer.
-
I'd say "even safer" than what? Over 15,000 nuclear reactor years & a handful of fatalities makes it the safest form of generation bar none. This is well known, but the meme of "dangerous" nuclear is spread deliberately and mischievously by people pretending to "save the planet"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.