Krauss acts like a man baby whenever he talks to people he disagrees with
-
-
-
100% agree
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hey I'll be there. I'm going to ask 5 is/ought questions and 10 questions about free will but I'm going to make sure to start all of my questions with lots of rambling!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can we expect you guys, and/or
@RichardDawkins, to come down to India for a talk anytime soon?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
See if you can find some bigger chairs for this next one. In some shots, we could still see you guys.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't the beguiled krauss critically endangered?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sam, I am a huge fan of yours and
@LKrauss1. I attended the NY performance with 3 of my family members. In short, “this presentation needs work.” One hour of unfocused discussion, with half hour of repetitive Q&A, hardly made the ticket price.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We’re coming from Minneapolis to see you.
#roadtripThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where do they find those incredibly comfy-looking chairs?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Looking forward to it! Please don't repeat pro-atheism arguments like the previous events in this tour. Let's hear some new ideas!
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Sigh. Lawrence Krauss is an accomplished physicist. Surely there's more to talk about than how evil theocracy is.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Disagree on the points here. I think there's a lot of room to discuss new discoveries in physics, while leaving the mutual backpatting out of it. Problem is when they discuss science, it's always in opposition to religion/antiscience.
-
So when they say how beautiful the universe is/how interesting quantum mechanics is, it's always in comparison to the views of creationists or people like Deepak Chopra. It just validates those viewpoints and feels unnecessarily combative. They should just stick to the science.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Ask him how nothingy a nothing has to be before it's nothing rather than something.
-
since when was "nothing" a real thing--except in mind games?
-
-
lol. That was his point in defining "nothing". Seems to have gone over your head.
-
Lol, indeed. You can't just redefine pre-existing terms and then use them interchangeably which, assuming his claim is to have any significance at all, Krauss must do. If not, his claim is worth precisely nothing (old sense).
-
lol. are you suggesting that theologians/philosophers have given a cogent definition of nothing?
-
No, but I could have claimed that since they have. I was talking about the everyday concept. You know, the one Krauss equivocated on to fleece rubes such as yourself by buying a book that didn't show anything like the title implied.
-
lol. Where is that cogent philosophic definition of nothing? It's probably nowhere. Krauss's point is the everyday concept of nothing is nonsense. You've missed his point. Delete yourself.
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.