He is snake oil through and through, the next Chopra
For the record: I didn't title the article. (But "catastrophic" isn't far off.)
I disagree with @jordanbpeterson on many important points, but he is well worth engaging with an open mind. This was a nearly terminal case of close-mindedness.https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/953779268919599105 …
-
-
-
Do you support Sam's foreign policy ? Peterson is more of a liberal foreign policy wise than neocon Sam
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What do you mean by experiment. What do you mean by dichotomy. What do you mean by social.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm sure you would still agree that her level of engagement with him was appalling?
End of conversation
-
-
-
You're obviously right in a way, but I'm really not sure a cerebral exchange between two experts would have served the public better. I guarantee you she addressed things - over and over - that were running through the minds of casual modern 'liberal' people.
-
I think there's a general lack of understanding about how precise guys like Sam and Jordan are with their arguments even among their listeners. Apparently journalists too. They mean precisely what they say and nothing else.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I admire Peterson's patience...
-
Almost the same degree of patience Sam had with Peterson in their first podcast.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.