I'm getting tired of political buzz, I believe Einstein didn't discuss Hitler with this intensity. Sam,please, less politics, more science
-
-
-
I think that
@SamHarrisOrg has interesting things to say about all of our mental blindspots including politics. You might learn something. -
that is why I said didn't say "no politics"
-
Dude shut up he's one of the smartest guys on the planet right now, just shut your trap and listen
-
Well, apparently listening to
@SamHarrisOrg didn't add much to your personal merit. Behave!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think, You have better things to do than being involved in American politics.

-
Tweet unavailable
-
You seriously cannot be saying this without recognizing the irony of your words, right? I mean... right?!?!?


End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This still fakenews. Read the fckin report. 1st, not 4 agencies--3 (DNI is jus overseein body). & NSA only expressed "moderate confidence."
-
Moreover, when it comes to DNC emails ODNI OPINION WORTHLESS. This is fcking crazy. Fake news bonanza. See also: http://disobedientmedia.com/2017/07/new-research-shows-guccifer-2-0-files-were-copied-locally-not-hacked/ …pic.twitter.com/ZFzH5cG8vr
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trump cultists have no shame, Sam. Do you really think they care if they're proven wrong?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Yawn. You say they were ignored but she was investigated like 14 times by the republicans lol
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Oh please they controlled congress and tried 14 times and couldn't find a single thing. They are either stupid or there is nothing there.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
(Yawn) Cut that out. Don't polarize and don't quit your discourse, this is good. I meant it. Those Clinton emails, right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was a lie by the NYT, not a meme. I can't believe the faith you have in the MSM.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The pt of clarifying it was only 3-4 is that the "17 agencies" lie was used 4 months. Enabled by many of the Deep Staters you've platformed
-
Saying DJT's use of "3 or 4" is mimimizing consensus is disingenuous when the whole pt of "17" was to inflate consensus. But, only 1 correct
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.