Everything? Ok Sam. Come on sometime and debate #outofcontext
-
-
-
1) Brooks, it would've taken minutes to check, *before* humiliating yourself, that Sam was setting up a hypothetical for me to knock down
-
2) "nodding acquiescence of M'jid (sic) Nawaz who really comes of looking, just pathetic and embarrassing." No. What's embarrassing is youpic.twitter.com/gGuUtgEjoS
-
3)My name is Maah-Jid, not M'jid,nor Ma-Jeed.Your laziness is also clearly reflected in your patent disregard for Arabic name pronunciations
-
4) So no,there's no 'debate' here.Your error is compounded by your *bigotry* of low expectations toward me. You fucked up. Own it &apologise
-
5) only neo-orientalist colonial anti-Muslim bigots attribute to me a "Yes Massah" acquiescence &remove my intellectual agency. Apology owedpic.twitter.com/vthjD19Snf
-
6) Sometimes in life one fucks up so bad they simply need to apologise & try to move on, not 'debate' it. This is one of those times, Brooks
-
7) Hey Brooks,*this* is how you apologise like an adult,when you realise you fucked up bad over this.Humble yourselfhttps://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/884118603087437824 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Haha. And this is the guy begging Rubin to be on his show. Seems like Majority Report is nothing but TYT level hackery.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Why should they offer up any of their time to people have shown a committal to nothing but dishonesty and slander?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I'm sure Sam's are, but you don't have an obligation to debate and defend yourself after someone has intentionally spread slanderous lies.
-
If someone has portrayed your opinions in bad faith, they are not worth your time. Maybe if Mike learns to be honest there can be a debate.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Clearly I'm wasting my time. You'll never get it. This isn't how it works. You don't get to slander someone, then demand a debate. Fuck off.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Keep in mind that
@_michaelbrooks is against discussion of any human rights violations around Islam.pic.twitter.com/6cA7jE9lKP - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I saw that in a response by Atheism-Is-Unstoppable. This is the worst cherry-picking out of context bullshit I've ever seen.
-
They should have read this article before attempting criticism of this legendary trust fund baby.http://www.echoplexmedia.com/new-blog/2016/9/7/your-comprehensive-sam-harris-criticism-check-list …
-
Hey look, it's Dave shilling his "article" off the back of another twitter uproar! It never gets old, does it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.