3 more hours of technical philosophical semantics? Can’t wait. (Not sarcasm, bizarrely I quite enjoyed the previous one)
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
nice. dont be afraid to stick to the same topic as last time. honestly people enjoyed it.
-
You must be insane.
-
i know many who enjoyed it, two completely opposing epistemological views collide. i liked it :P
-
Philosophically if that's what floats your boat. Prefer a tad more concrete in the mix myself
-
i think most people that didnt like it probably didnt understand it.
-
I understood it and came to the conclusion that JBP's definition of truth is insanity
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Two of my favorite minds at the moment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
is this TRUE?
-
This could cause Humanity's extinction in 10,000 years so its definitely FALSE. /s
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
glad to hear you are going to give it another shot! Looking forward to hearing it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please just agree in advance that "true" simply means "in accordance with fact or reality." No more, no less.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If Jordan wouldn't try to redefine truth, so that he can construe a belief of god to be "true" he'd be cooler
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What could possibly go wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
great to hear! Let's just hope no one tries to define what "truth" is again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh sweet. 3 more hours of obscurantism and word games.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.