Obama bombs countries, that's ok, Trump bans migrants from same countries, that's not ok.
-
-
-
one is a good-faith counter-terrorism effort; the other is incoherent cruelty
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
is, as always, on point. My quibble is that he calls his opposition "liberals". They are ideological or Regressive leftists.
-
I'm a classical liberal and I wouldn't share a meal with those "liberals".
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
"It is perfectly possible—and increasingly necessary—to speak about the ideological roots of Islamism and jihadism, and even about the...
-
...unique need for reform within mainstream Islam itself, without lapsing into bigotry or disregarding the suffering of refugees." YES.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but it isn't a Muslim ban.....
-
it gives preferential treatment to Christians from the same countries. Therefore, it's a Muslim ban.
-
the EO literally doesn't mention any religion at all and is a ban across-the-board
-
it's not in the EO so it isn't happening. And if you watched the interview, they are reporting it incorrectly
-
yes I'm sure the promise of the POTUS to prioritize Christians while referencing his own EO is meaningless
-
Preferential treatment to Christians should be given when they are the ones being persecuted.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Appears
@SamHarrisOrg didn’t read the Exec Order and especially didn’t read ideology paragraph where Trump does EXACTLY what Sam says!https://twitter.com/SamHarrisOrg/status/825847899313430528 …
-
Point 2 convinced me Sam didn't read the EO nor any fair analysis of the EO.
-
now read someone who did read the EO http://bit.ly/2jllQjW
-
Beautiful write-up. I would like to see Sam help peel back the hysteria he participated in.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.