No, but the Dumbocrats put up an unethical, dishonest criminal against him. So here we are. They blew it. We're screwed.
-
-
-
Remind me, which of the two candidates has paid millions to settle fraud lawsuits?
-
work on your comprehension. I wasn't defending Trump, just opining as to how it was possible that he got elected. Both are crooks
-
You're comparing the typical politics of Clinton to the prima facie corruption of Trump. False equivalence.
-
Whitewater. Clinton Foundation. Saudi money. Haiti. Your bias is blinding you. Again, not defending The Donald. I'm done
-
You're doing literally that by normalizing his actually illegal activities by equating them to Clinton's questionable ones
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Mr Harris when you discounted the corruption of HRC & real risks tied to her.. maybe you might listen .
-
What does HRC have to do with the question? She is irrelevant to the question.
-
Sam is playing Trash Trump.. We have Trump due to Hillary .. we have who we have now.. so cope
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Sam uses his fame 2 Trash
@realDonaldTrump rather than help his admin w science . Help make better outcome
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You'd argue that
@HillaryClinton is? She beats him at well informed which makes her less ethical. -
Clinton is irrelevant in his question. Accepting Trump not having those qualities does not mean Clinton does.
-
Nah, he was questioning the decision to elect Trump based on those qualities when neither has them. Relevant.
-
I disagree, the question he posed seems like a post-election criticism that left Clinton out of the equation.
-
We will never know but given that the timeline of events I think both beliefs are rational.
-
I see what you mean, and it's true that we are not the ones that will know for sure. Just spectators really.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.