@YouTube Gad Saad is an outstanding egotistical phony and fake intellectual. Not interested.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gad has an interesting perspective. It's too bad he's an egotistical, unbearable, crass ideologue on social media.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
First podcast I felt I didn't learn anything. Gad uses a professorial word salad to say very little
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What does everyone think about flashing drawings of Mohammed & judging rage to as a key part of the vetting process?
-
Heh I like that idea. They could measure it through brain scans.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm convinced that if we lived in a world where
@SamHarrisOrg had a billion followers the world would be a far, far better place.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@YouTube Awesome discussion. Very insightful.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sam you spent half the podcast whinging about how you don't have time to speak about and address certain subjects..
-
This is a free podcast and Sam doesn't own shit to you. Why would Sam have to know everything for you?
-
he owes me & and should know everything for me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@YouTube I was fairly disappointed in Gad Saad, on Trump, and some of his illiberal policy ideas. -
Saad made it clear that he's in it for Donald only because of Islam.So how could you fault him ?
-
I think because he over estimates the problem of Islam in the US & Donald's ability to deal with it.
-
Everyone over estimates the presidents abilities.Westerners will not accept Islamic related issues as an incidental cost.
-
that isn't true about westerners, though liberals do often have trouble speaking about Islamism sensibly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
facinating. But I don't think you're factoring in the ultimate fate of the refugees if they're not taken in
-
hypothetically, what if you take in two hundred thousands and some of them are terrorist who end up killing a few ppl
-
while if you don't take them in many more will die in the war. Shouldn't that factor into the decision as well?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can assure you that Stefan Molyneux is not a racist crackpot. He just like Sam has no topic which is off limits.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.